The personal Kind of the newest Counselor Survey (PST-Q) was developed by Fernandez-Alvarez ainsi que al

(2003), and you may was designed to assess “the latest group of attributes that every specialist applies in every psychotherapeutic condition, ergo creating an element of the features of the fresh new healing operate” (p. 117). The new questionnaire analyzes four different dimensions: flexibility-rigidity (Instructional subscale), distance-intimacy (Expressive subscale), cheaper engagement-better involvement (Wedding subscale), wider concentrated-narrow concentrated (Attentional subscale) and you can natural-structured (Medical subscale). This really is an effective thirty six-product self-report level completed of the practitioners which have answers ranked into the an effective scale anywhere between step one (total conflict)so you can 7 (full arrangement). The brand new measure indicates an examination-retest precision away from .79, that have Chronbach’s accuracy coefficients for each and every subscale, as follows; educational, .69; expressive, .75; engagement, .78; attentional, .80; operative, .78. Foundation Research revealed a good KMO = .756 (Look for Desk step 1 to possess alphas in the current research).

Working Alliance List-Short Setting (WAI-S)

The functional Alliance List (WAI), created by Horvath Greenberg (1986), try an effective thirty six items questionnaire which may be given so you’re able to each other clients and you may therapists and that’s rated to your an excellent 7-point Likert type size from1 (never)to seven (always). Tracey and Kokotovic (1989) recommended a consumer and therapist Doing work Alliance Index-Brief Means (WAI-S), which has four points for every single subscale (Activity, Mission, and you will Thread) and overall WAI-S scores, indicating high precision which have leader membership exactly like, plus much better than this new WAI towards counselor subscales and overall average ratings (Task, alpha = .83; Bond, alpha = .91; Mission, leader = .88; and you may General Alliance, alpha = .95). Come across Dining table step 1 for alphas in today’s study.

Techniques Listing (TL)

The methods Number level is adjusted out of Hollis (1995), which catalogued an intensive a number of guidance and you can therapy process representing an over-all spectrum of philosophical angles. To help you refine this comprehensive list predicated on procedure utilized especially because of the intellectual behavioural and you will constructivist medication orientations, i hired counseling mindset scholar college students to learn the entire set of 108 therapy procedure and you can rate the fresh new the amount to which each method is employed by each therapeutic method (intellectual behavioral and you can constructivist), having fun with an excellent 5-point Likert variety of size from just one (Never ever or Rarely) so you’re able to 5 (Constantly otherwise Typically).

Methods

Sixteen counseling psychology graduate students participated in these ratings (six men, 10 women), with the Mage = (SD = 2.67). Results of a paired differences analysis for all 108 items indicated that there were 77 techniques rated as being used with significantly differential frequency by cognitive behavioral and constructivist therapies. We then divided this distribution of 77 techniques into quartiles and retained the top and bottom quartiles. This resulted in 20 cognitive behavioral techniques (e.g.advice giving, rational restructuring) and 20 constructivist techniques (e.g. emotional processing, reflection) that were rated most significantly different (cognitive behavioral vs. constructivist). This final list of 40 items of therapy techniques (20 cognitive behavioral techniques; 20 constructivist techniques) was used in the current study.

Such forty items was in fact detailed alphabetically and members was indeed expected so you can price the latest the total amount that they normally use for every single techniques inside their habit of medication along an effective 5-point size from just one (Never ever otherwise Hardly ever)in order to 5 (Usually or More often than not). Brand new critiques of your own 20 rationalist issues have been summed and you may a great mean is actually computed to help you mirror the average frequency of using rationalist treatments (you can easily range = 1-5), and the exact same process was utilized when considering the newest 20 constructivist treatments.

This new brutal studies was used so you can perform an excellent confirmatory factor research with the Process Listing measure. The modern investigation is checked to have multiple-variate normalcy as well as the assumptions have been satisfied. All kurtosis rates on parameters decrease between step one and you will –1 variables except constructivist affairs twelve, 13, 16, and you can 20 and you may cognitive behavioural product step three, which in ukraine date fact had good kurtosis thinking between 2 and you may –2. Consequently, these types of four products were taken from the newest size before powering the confirmatory basis analysis.